<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimal Access Surgery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/</link>
	<description>As life cruises along; vita non est vivere sed valere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://med97um.net/george/?p=10#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Well thanks. 

I do follow as far as possible the Cochrane Review for Lap Appendectomy. I am now into Lap TEP hernia repair. Lap ventral hernia repair  has definite advantages except for very small hernias which can be repaired by Mayo&#039;s technique.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well thanks. </p>
<p>I do follow as far as possible the Cochrane Review for Lap Appendectomy. I am now into Lap TEP hernia repair. Lap ventral hernia repair  has definite advantages except for very small hernias which can be repaired by Mayo&#8217;s technique.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary George</title>
		<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://med97um.net/george/?p=10#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Dear Doctor,
  MAS is better than the opensurgery,Because MAS has more benefit than open surgery.Try your best to prove it &amp;reveal to others. All the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Doctor,<br />
  MAS is better than the opensurgery,Because MAS has more benefit than open surgery.Try your best to prove it &amp;reveal to others. All the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://med97um.net/george/?p=10#comment-14</guid>
		<description>George, 

1. Cholecystectomy: no fight. Lap wins hands down.

2. Appendicectomy: a lot of advantages. Use in the appropriate setting.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Cochrane Review: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. The authors&#039; concluded that:

In those clinical settings where surgical expertise and equipment are available and affordable, diagnostic laparoscopy and LA (either in combination or separately) seem to have various advantages over OA. Some of the clinical effects of LA, however, are small and of limited clinical relevance. In spite of the mediocre quality of the available research data, we would generally recommend to use laparoscopy and LA in patients with suspected appendicitis unless laparoscopy itself is contraindicated or not feasible. &lt;strong&gt;Especially young female, obese, and employed patients seem to benefit from LA.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Lap&quot; sounds better than &quot;open&quot; to patients too ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, </p>
<p>1. Cholecystectomy: no fight. Lap wins hands down.</p>
<p>2. Appendicectomy: a lot of advantages. Use in the appropriate setting.</p>
<blockquote><p>Cochrane Review: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. The authors&#8217; concluded that:</p>
<p>In those clinical settings where surgical expertise and equipment are available and affordable, diagnostic laparoscopy and LA (either in combination or separately) seem to have various advantages over OA. Some of the clinical effects of LA, however, are small and of limited clinical relevance. In spite of the mediocre quality of the available research data, we would generally recommend to use laparoscopy and LA in patients with suspected appendicitis unless laparoscopy itself is contraindicated or not feasible. <strong>Especially young female, obese, and employed patients seem to benefit from LA.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Lap&#8221; sounds better than &#8220;open&#8221; to patients too <img src='http://www.gcgeorge.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://med97um.net/george/?p=10#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Thanks Bernard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Bernard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard</title>
		<link>http://www.gcgeorge.net/2006/09/27/minimal-access-surgery/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 12:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://med97um.net/george/?p=10#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Aye for minimal access, I say. Got to go... will say more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye for minimal access, I say. Got to go&#8230; will say more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

